
Why so few good films from a good actor? Unfortunately, from what I've read about his career, he may have been his own worst enemy at times. Whenever he was under contract to a major studio, he seems to have had a habit of insisting, loudly and repeatedly, that he should be a great leading man. He only seems to have succeeded in alienating his employers repeatedly. Though always working, he was one of those actors who never quite grasped the brass ring. In the Three Godfathers he's dynamic, funny, attractive and he shows more subtlety than usual.
I also think that Lewis Stone was really splendid in his part in this version of the tale. He's not too sentimental as an educated man who's thrown his life away but, as he gradually realizes that he's not going to survive, seems to be doing a mostly silent philosophical review of that ruined life. He has his stentorian moments, but it's a relief and a delight to see him play a thoughtful yet livelier character than ol' Judge Hardy.

The Ford version also differs in the fact that it is visual poetry from beginning to end. Ford, with his cinematographer Winton Hoch, captures the harsh beauty of the desert in every frame. The '30s version, directed by Richard Boleslawski & photographed by one of the masters, Joseph Ruttenberg, communicates the bleakness of the setting in a straight forward manner with few frills.
The problem that I have with the Ford version, however, is with the sentimentality that is just poured on during some--not all--of the segments. I also think that the ending of Ford's version is much less satisfying and geared more toward fulfilling that happy-ending impulse. It really annoyed me when I first saw it. Then, after finding the '36 version, I found that its Depression era economy of detail, snappy dialogue and implied, rather than explicit sentiment, made this a much better film for me.
Btw, director Boleslawski was one of the original Moscow Art Theatre actors and a founder of NYC's American Laboratory Theatre, (a forerunner to the Group Theater which he operated with Maria Ouspenskaya). He made some good and some pretentious movies after washing up on the shores of the West Coast as a director in the early thirties following the collapse of financing for theatre work in NY. This movie definitely falls in the good category. Too bad that Boleslawski died a year after this movie. It's possible that he had hit his stride with this one.
Sorry to have gone on so long about this film, but it's a favorite.
2 comments:
I realize that I should have mentioned more about Walter Brennan's acting in this piece. He remains a vital, seamless character actor at this stage of his career, with no embellishments on his style, which gives his character a vitality and emotional power that some of his better known roles cannot match.
Gone on so long? It is enough to have me look for it. I knew it about this version but never have seen it. Chester Morris is not someone who really gets my attention but this certainly seems a different type of role. Looking forward to it.
Post a Comment